2016 January 25    Digital   Camera Reviews

Updated January 2018

Panasonic has the ZS60K digital camera available; its predecessor the ZS50 has been on the market for a couple years now.

Today we're going to take another look at the ZS50.  Now that I've put in a lot of hours with this camera-- and now that the ZS60 has been out for a while-- I'm seeing a few issues that you might want to know about.

As you may know, the ZS50 and ZS60 are travel cameras that have a 30x zoom.

Does this sound too good to be true?  It might be.  Let's find out.

A Quick Note

This article is possible only with the support of readers like you, when you purchase your gear through the links on here.
It doesn't add any extra to the cost, and it helps me keep bringing you helpful articles and reviews.   Thank you for your help.

In This Article

Some Specifications


Power-Up / Basic Use

Auto Mode



Image Quality

White Balance


Low-Light / High ISO Performance


ZS50 vs. ZS60


Some Specifications (ZS50)

35mm Zoom Equivalent:  24-720mm
Apertures Available:   f/3.3-6.4
Batteries:  Panasonic DMW-BCM13E   (3.6V, 1250 mAh, 4.5 Wh   Li-ion battery)
Battery Charges Outside Camera?  No

Connectors:  USB multi (AV out / digital);  Mini-HDMI out
Crop Factor:  5.2
Exposure Compensation:  +/-2 EV in 1/3-stop increments
Exposure Control:   Auto, Programmed Auto (P), Aperture Priority (Av), Shutter Priority (Tv), Manual (M), & Smart Auto scene modes
Flash:  Built-in only
Focus:  Auto;  Auto Macro;  Manual Focus also available
GPS:  No
HDR:  Yes (in-camera)
Image Formats:  JPG and 12-bit RAW
Image Processor:  Venus Engine
Image Stabilization:  Optical
Introduced:  2015 April
ISO settings:  ISO 80 through 6400, with Auto ISO available
LCD:  3" fixed TFT (1,040K dots)
Lens:  non-interchangeable zoom lens, Leica DC Vario Elmar, 4.3 to 129 mm
Memory (Built-In):  86 MB
Metering:  Multi, Center-Weighted, & Spot modes
Microphone:  Built-In only (Stereo) / no mic input jack
Panoramic Modes:  Yes (in-camera)
Resolution:  12.1 megapixels
Sensor:  1/2.3 inch MOS (7.7 mm diagonal)
Shutter speeds:   4 to 1/2,000th (can set it for up to 60 sec. in Starry Sky scene mode).
Video:  1080p @ 60 fps (AVCHD);  1080p @ 30 fps (MP4)
Viewfinder:   Electronic (1,166k-dot EVF)
Weight (no batteries):  about 8 1/2 ounces with battery
Wi-Fi:  Yes
Zoom magnification:  30x (optical) (24-720 mm equivalent) 


The ZS50 has a removeable battery, but it has to be in the camera when charging it.

Serious photographers tend to prefer batteries that can charge externally, but for a travel camera it's not as critical. At least you can swap out the battery, which means you can carry spares that are already juiced up.  You just have to charge them while they're inside the camera, that's all.

(Back to top)

Power-Up & Basic Use

The Panasonic bridge cameras, such as the FZ70 and FZ200, have the power switch in a very convenient place where you can activate it with the flip of a thumb.

The ZS50 has a power button which, presumably, is supposed to be pressed with your index finger.  You know, the same finger you'll use to press the shutter button when you're taking pictures.  In theory this sounds easier, although I greatly prefer the power switch on the FZ70 / FZ200.

Zooming is fairly intuitive, just as on the bridge cameras. 

Given the small size of this camera, there are quite a few buttons in the control space that was designed for your right index finger. It's definitely less spacious than you'll find on a bridge camera or a DSLR, but I doubt anyone will be surprised here.  It's very compact, which is one of the main selling points.

Basically, we've got something that's almost as compact as a smartphone, but it has a somewhat larger sensor, a much more powerful zoom, and a host of actual, physical controls like a serious camera.  That's because it is a serious camera, or at least as serious as you're going to get in a camera with a point-and-shoot sensor (1/2.3").

Right away, one other stand-out feature is the control ring around the lens.  Mine is set to control white balance, but you can program it to do other functions instead.  (I think I probably bumped something accidentally to set it that way;  it's probably supposed to control the aperture.)

Auto Mode

The ZS50 has "iA" mode (Intelligent Auto), just as you'd find on the bridge cameras (FZ70, FZ200, FZ300). 

One thing I like about this is that it knows when to switch between macro and regular focus modes.  The only drawback is that it doesn't always get the AF right on macro, but that's not an issue with Intelligent Auto mode.

(Back to top)


The video record button on the ZS50 is near the shutter release, just as you'll find on the FZ200, FZ70, etc;  however, it's a bit smaller, as you'd expect.   

You can activate Record from almost any mode, which is handy. 

Probably, no one is going to expect a mic input jack on a camera this small, and there's not one.  It's a travel camera;  if you're that serious about doing video on your vacation, you'll probably be bringing along a DSLR anyway. 

The ZS50 supports both MP4 and AVCHD formats.  You might recognize AVCHD as a digital camcorder format;  it's not something I remember seeing on many still cams. 

The MP4 format on this camera gives you 30 fps across the board, whether you're shooting at 1080, 720, or 480p.  If you want higher framerates, use AVCHD;  you can get 60 fps in 1080 or 720 here. 

(Back to top)


No external flash unit, because there's no hotshoe.   Not surprising at all for a camera this small and compact.  The built-in flash works pretty well, even as a fill-flash.   

One of the first things I look for with camera flash is anything annoying, like those awful, headache-inducing pre-flashes that some cameras use (*ahem* Canon). 

I didn't see that here;  even the anti-redeye mode fires the flash only once before the main flash goes. 

Christmas Ornament With Flash

Panasonic DMC-ZS50K

No significant adjustments.

The flash seems to illuminate evenly, although I didn't test it at ridiculous ranges (like across-the-street at night).  

Overall, I like the implementation;  and it's just one of many things to like about this camera.

(Back to top)

Image Quality

At 12.1 megapixels, the ZS50 has what I consider the ideal resolution for this sensor size (which is nominally 1/2.3"). 

Higher pixel counts start to lose detail from diffraction.

There's also the Leica lens, which is about as close as I'll probably get to owning a Leica.  (I'd consider a Leica film camera, but their digital cameras do not interest me. At all.)

So far, we've got the basis for good image quality, but there's one more major element.

The colors.

Right out of the box, straight-from-camera, photos from the ZS50 seem a little too blue/cyan-- as if they need a warming filter or something.  It's not that noticeable;  here's a photo taken in late-afternoon shade which somewhat accentuates the effect. 

The colors look good in many conditions, but sometimes... well, it took me a while to realize it, but I don't like the color balance (or something) on this camera.   The Panasonic FZ70, FZ200, etc... they're all perfect.  But the ZS50 gives images-- sometimes-- that just aren't up to par. 


Panasonic DMC-ZS50K

Overcast / late afternoon shade

No significant adjustments

One definite issue: the ZS50 doesn't let you adjust saturation.

The advanced user manual does not contain ONE instance of the word "saturation", so it's not that I'm overlooking it.  It's just not there.

There is some control over white balance, though;  see White Balance.

The ZS50 seems to be designed for users who are semi-serious, but not serious enough to want control over color rendition.  Instead there are a few pre-set "Scene" modes.  These are great for vacations, but somewhat limiting for an enthusiast.

Now, if you're even halfway competent at post-processing, this is not going to be that much of an issue for you.   Except that it wastes time.  I'm not going to say I'm too busy to post-process photos "ever", because no real photographer is that ridiculous.  But at some point, a camera's color programming-- or whatever you want to call it-- is just not what you're looking for.  To get the colors where you want them can be too much work. 

What's weird, though, is that the colors are often OK straight from the camera;  on this one, all I did was increase the brightness and contrast a bit.

Maple Leaves and Blue-Grey

Nov. 2, 2015

Panasonic DMC-ZS50K
ISO 80
1/320th sec.
66.8mm focal length

Brightness and Contrast were adjusted on computer.

(Back to top)

White Balance

Unlike the Panasonic bridge cameras, the ZS50 doesn't offer as much fine-adjustment of the white balance.  Instead of a two-axis adjustment, there's a one-axis adjustment.  

The ZS50 allows you to shift the white balance toward red or blue only.  This is better than nothing, but if you want more DSLR-like color control in a superzoom, get the FZ200, FZ300, or at least the FZ70.  They're larger cameras,  but that's usually how it goes;  the really compact ones forego some of the advanced features.

(Back to top)


Leica DC Vario-Elmar (12 elements in 9 groups). 

Meanwhile, the FZ200 has a Leica DC Vario-Elmarit lens (14 elements, 10 groups).

As far as I know, the major functional difference between Elmar and Elmarit is the maximum aperture.  The Elmarit goes to f/2.8 at the widest, while Elmar goes to f/3.3. 

Thus far the lens on the ZS50 seems very good.    As with any real-life zoom lens, the corners are not going to be quite as sharp as the center, but I didn't find it to be distracting here.  It's relatively mild.

Blue Sky With Tree Branches

Panasonic DMC-ZS50K
ISO 80
1/500th sec.
4.3mm focal length

No significant adjustments.

Under some conditions, I think the FZ200 has sharper pictures overall, but I'll have to compare to be sure.  If anything, it seems to be a matter of the focal length you're currently using.

For everyday shooting it's not significant enough that I'd give it much thought.  I'm more interested in this camera as a "portable sketchbook" for composing film photographs.  And for that, it works great.

(Back to top)

Low-Light / High ISO Performance

A 1/2.3" sensor is good up through about ISO 800 in dim light, and maybe 1600 in brighter light. 

In very dim lighting, you'll either need to use a tripod or flash.  

This, again, is par for the course with small-sensor digital cameras.   As with its bridge-camera brethren, the ZS50 is primarily a daylight camera.  You'd want to take this along to the wildlife park at noon, but it's not the kind of camera you'll want for ambient-light pictures when you go to that restaurant later in the evening.  

(For that use, I'd pick this.)

If you're somewhere you can use a flash, then it's not an issue. 

Besides, if you're like me, you will begin to annoy your wife and kids while you're trying to take all those ambient-light photos while the dinner slowly gets cold. 

My advice:  stop trying to pose the food thirty different ways.  Just take a quick snapshot with a flash, put the camera away, and enjoy your meal. 


The 30x optical zoom is quite significant for a camera this compact.  (Consider that the Panasonic FZ200-- a full-fledged superzoom camera-- has a 24x optical zoom.)  The FZ200 will have sharper images across more of its zoom range, but the little ZS50 is surprisingly good for what it is.  

The 35mm-equivalent zoom range on the ZS50 is 24 through 720 millimeters.

(Back to top)

ZS50 vs. ZS60

There are several key differences which could easily swing the decision in favor of the new Panasonic ZS60:

1.  The ZS60 can shoot 4K video.  This will probably become increasingly important as the rest of technology moves onward.

2.  The ZS60 has a touchscreen.  Although this doesn't matter so much to me, some people practically require one.

3.  The ZS60 has 49-point autofocus, whereas the ZS50 has 23-point.  The ZS60 is supposed to have faster AF, also, which isn't surprising.  Fast AF is one of the key requirements for being able to use a superzoom with any success.

4.  The ZS60 has a ridiculously fast maximum shutter speed of 1/16,000th of a second.  This would be more useful to me if the camera also had a flash hotshoe, but as it is, I'm sure you'll find situations where the fast shutter speed can be useful.

Is there anything in favor of the older ZS50? 

Well, aside from the fact that it costs less, I'd still prefer the ZS50 for pure still-shooting.  That's because 12 MP is about the largest number of pixels that should rightfully be on a sensor this small.  At 18 MP, the ZS60 is almost certainly going to show the effects of diffraction more obviously.  That, and it probably won't be as good in low-light photography.

Probably the ZS60 can handle its megapixel count better than the older ZS40 (which also had 18.1 MP), because I would expect the ZS60 to have better JPG processing.  Then again, there are limits.

As for the ZS60 vs. the ZS50:  both cameras have RAW image capability, both have Wi-Fi, and both have the same resolution LCD's and EVF's.   You can't go too far wrong with either camera;  the ZS50 is definitely more affordable.

(Back to top)

Now, The Really Bad Points

The ZS50 seems to be just what we've always wanted: a "real" compact vacation camera.  It has a viewfinder, it has powerful zoom, and it fits in your pocket... excellent!

I was able to overlook the drawbacks.  Mainly, it offers very little control over color rendition.  You could sort of deal with that, though, right?

But then the camera died one day.  For no apparent reason.  This was the camera I used to photograph my Timex watch, the one I left out in the rain for months.  I probably even ran over that watch a couple times.

The Timex watch still works, but the camera doesn't.  And the camera was never left out in the rain.  I always took good care of it.

The ZS50's first failure indication was that it wouldn't record video anymore.  Within a day or two, the camera wouldn't work at all.  "System error" or "lens error", can't remember which.  It's not even good for a doorstop now (too light).

But worst of all, this is not really a rare problem with these cameras.  It's a rather ambitious design, maybe too much so.  We take these technologies for granted, but how would you make a 30x-zoom camera this small?  The camera companies weren't even able to do this until recently.  And maybe they need a few more iterations to work the bugs out.


For the most part, the Panasonic ZS50 lives up to its design purpose:  it's a good little vacation camera with 30x zoom.  But there are a couple issues.

The first one is the color rendition.  It's good, but I've seen better from a 1/2.3" sensor.  The ZS50 / 60 don't have a sharpness problem;  it just seems to be the color processing. 

The ZS50 has a good lens and powerful zoom, but that brings us to the other concern.  They crammed 30x of zoom power into a really small camera.  As you might guess, that gives a mechanism that's not as robust.  Thus, the camera can flake out when you least want it to.  "System error", and you gots no camera. 

Just a preliminary impression, but it looks to me like as many as 5-10% of buyers are having this problem with their new ZS-series cameras.

At this point I'd say it's a "pretty good" camera, but not fantastic. 

If your vacation really requires a pocketable camera, try one of these.  No viewfinder, no 30x zoom... but only $200-ish.  For many vacation settings, there's nothing that says you can't bring an FZ80 or FZ300.  Generally I'd recommend one of those over the ZS50 / 60 / 100, any day. 

If you found this article helpful, please help me out by purchasing your cameras and stuff through the links on here.  It allows me to continue to bring you helpful articles like this one.

Thanks for visiting my website!


  Contact me:

3 p o.t o . 1 2 0 s t u d i o.. c o m

This won't directly copy and paste.  Please manually type it into your mail program.
No spaces between letters.


Home Page

Site News


Copyright 2016.  Feel free to share links to this page, but please don't directly copy images or text.

Back to Top of Page